Vorträge und Tagungen
1000 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-855 856-870 871-885 886-900 901-915 916-930 931-945 946-960 961-975 976-990 991-1000
Science hostility: What is it and how can we respond to it?Brandt, E. (2026, Oktober).Science hostility: What is it and how can we respond to it? Vortrag auf dem Workshop Between doubt and dialogue. Public engagement with science in hostile settings, PEX fellows session #4, Berlin School of Public Engagement and Open Science, Natural History Museum Berlin. |
How researchers assess publications, data and software before (re)use.Hartstein, J. (2026, Oktober).How researchers assess publications, data and software before (re)use. Vortrag auf dem Kolloquium Current Sociological Research Colloquium, Universität Zürich, Department of Sociology, Zürich, Schweiz. |
Why not just zenodo? How repositories envision uses and users.Schniedermann, A. (2026, Oktober).Why not just zenodo? How repositories envision uses and users. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 4S 2026 Toronto. 50th Anniversary for the Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), Toronto, Kanada. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23397579 |
Disciplinary diversity and research data infrastructures: What researchers do and what they need.Hartstein, J., & Blümel, C. (2026, Oktober).Disciplinary diversity and research data infrastructures: What researchers do and what they need. Vortrag auf der Konferenz Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), Toronto (online), Kanada. |
Wo Wissenschaftsfreiheit eingeschränkt wird: Zur Ver-Ortung eines Phänomens.Hamann, J., Fabian, G., Thompson, C., & Villa, P. (2026, Oktober).Wo Wissenschaftsfreiheit eingeschränkt wird: Zur Ver-Ortung eines Phänomens. Impulsvortrag auf dem Kongress Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie (43), Universität Mainz, Mainz. |
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Die Lösung für das Halluzinationsproblem?Hartstein, J. (2026, September/Oktober).Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Die Lösung für das Halluzinationsproblem? Vortrag auf der Konferenz Zukünfte der Gesellschaft: 43. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie, Mainz. |
The double-edged sword of open data sources: The prevalence and implications of questionable journals in OpenAlex.Stephen, D., Faria, R., & Kulczycki, E. (2026, September).The double-edged sword of open data sources: The prevalence and implications of questionable journals in OpenAlex. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 30th Annual International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI-ENID 2026), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. |
Credit where credit is due? Ideal and reality of co-author name ordering.Donner, P., & Gauffriau, M. (2026, September).Credit where credit is due? Ideal and reality of co-author name ordering. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 30th Annual International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI-ENID 2026), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Abstract
This study investigates researchers’ appraisals and experiences with criteria for ordering author names on scientific publications. We analyze survey responses of researchers from Austria, Switzerland, and Germany collected by the Zurich Survey of Academics. We find that researchers give normatively highest priority to criteria associated with the extent of research contribution. Relative minorities also favor alphabetical ordering and special treatment of researchers facing assessment situations. In comparison to these ideals, the practical relevance of research contribution is attenuated at the expense of status-based criteria (academic rank), which researchers normatively reject. Preferred criteria do not differ between genders. [...] |
A comparison of Scopus and OpenAlex for measuring international researcher mobility.Lovakov, A. (2026, September).A comparison of Scopus and OpenAlex for measuring international researcher mobility. Poster auf der Konferenz 30th Annual International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI-ENID 2026), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. |
Comparison of OpenAlex and Scopus coverage of German institutions’ publications in top-tier journals.Lovakov, A., & Sterligov, I. (2026, September).Comparison of OpenAlex and Scopus coverage of German institutions’ publications in top-tier journals. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 30th Annual International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI-ENID 2026), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. |
Innovation, openness, and publication strategies: A mixed-methods exploration of German inventors.Cruz Romero, R. (2026, September).Innovation, openness, and publication strategies: A mixed-methods exploration of German inventors. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 30th Annual International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI-ENID 2026), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22656739 |
Kontakt
