After his degree in Philosophy, Alexander Schniedermann studied the master program „History, Economics and Philosophy of Science” at the I²SoS institute, which is the successor of the Institute of Science and Technology Studies at Bielefeld University. Beside the curriculum, he worked as a student assistant for the Bavarian State Institute for Higher Education Research and Planning (IHF). Alexander is a scientific assistant at DZHW since October 2018, where he investigates the characteristics and functions of scientific review articles.
Alexander Schniedermann
Research Area Research System and Science Dynamics
Researcher
- +49 30 2064177-13
- +49 30 20164177-99
- Google Scholar
- Orcid
Projects
List of projects
Publications
List of publications
6 Übereinstimmungen gefunden /
Preprints in the German news media before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A comparative mixed-method analysis.Simons, A., & Schniedermann, A. (2023).Preprints in the German news media before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A comparative mixed-method analysis. In I. Broer, S. Lemke, A. Mazarakis, I. Peters, & C. Zinke-Wehlmann (Hrsg.), The Science-Media Interface. On the Relation Between Internal and External Science Communication (S. 53-78). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Saur (online first). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110776546-003 Abstract
Mainstream media widely references scientific publications for claims of factuality and authority. But how did science journalism deal with the sudden surge in preprint publications that provided rapid but often uncertain knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic? While several studies have investigated various aspects of preprint-based science communication, only a few have focused on the public discourse in Germany, albeit with substantial challenges and controversies. In this mixed-method study, we identified the usage of preprints for 1,006 in about 390,000 German news stories, qualitatively analyzed the contexts of these preprints, and developed codes that reflect the epistemic sentiments. We further compared ... |
On Top of the Hierarchy: How Guidelines Shape Systematic Reviewing in Biomedicine.Schniedermann, A., Blümel, C., & Simons, A. (2022).On Top of the Hierarchy: How Guidelines Shape Systematic Reviewing in Biomedicine. In S. Ehlers & S. Esselborn (Hrsg.), Evidence in Action between Science and Society - Constructing, Validating, and Contesting Knowledge (S. 102-126). New York: Routledge. |
Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research.Schniedermann, A. (2022).Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. Frontiers, https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.846822 (Abgerufen am: 01.07.2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.846822 |
A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies.Schniedermann, A. (2021).A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04199-0 |
The neglected politics behind evidence-based policy: shedding light on instrument constituency dynamics.Simons, A., & Schniedermann, A. (2021).The neglected politics behind evidence-based policy: shedding light on instrument constituency dynamics. Policy & Politics (online first). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16225469993170 |
Presentations
List of presentations & conferences
Roles and perceptions of publication genres in times of crisis.Simons, A., & Schniedermann, A. (2024, September).Roles and perceptions of publication genres in times of crisis. Vortrag auf der Konferenz Science, Technology, Humanity, and the Earth. 11th ESHS Conference, European Society for the History of Science (ESHS), Barcelona, Spain. |
Reporting guidelines and their impact on papers, practices, and patterns in biomedical research.Schniedermann, A. (2024, Mai).Reporting guidelines and their impact on papers, practices, and patterns in biomedical research. Vortrag auf dem Workshop Research Seminar, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Netherlands. |
Standards, Stages and Sideshows in Biomedicine.Schniedermann, A. (2024, März).Standards, Stages and Sideshows in Biomedicine. Vortrag auf der Konferenz Leakage. Inaugural Conference of stsing e.V., Sandra Buchmüller, Michaela Büsse, Kristiane Fehrs, Moritz Ingwersen, Anja H. Lind, Johanna Mehl, Judith Miggelbrink, Michelle Pfeifer, Susann Wagenknecht, Technische Universität, Dresden. |
Who writes what? The academic age paterns of review genres in biomedicine.Schniedermann, A. (2023, September).Who writes what? The academic age paterns of review genres in biomedicine. Vortrag auf der Konferenz 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023), Leiden, Netherlands. doi.org/10.55835/6441b6d076bb0bb2c9ff4c15 |
Klausurtagung des DZHW-Forschungsclusters " Open Science " .
Workshop Klausurtagung des DZHW-Forschungsclusters "Open Science", DZHW, Berlin. |
Systematic reviews and the standardization of biomedical knowledge, or - what can we do with document types?Schniedermann, A. (2023, März).Systematic reviews and the standardization of biomedical knowledge, or - what can we do with document types? Vortrag auf dem Symposium "Netzwerktreffen des Kompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie", Kompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie, SUB Göttingen. |
Standardization in Science. With Reporting Gidelines towards Transparency and Open Science in Biomedicine.Schniedermann, A. (2022, Juli).Standardization in Science. With Reporting Gidelines towards Transparency and Open Science in Biomedicine. Vortrag im Rahmen der Interdisciplinary International Graduate Summer School “Open science”: ambivalences and tensions ‐ New borderlands between science, technology and society., University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian, Spain. |
Licht am Ende des Tunnels? Mit Transparenzzstandards in Richtung Open Science.Schniedermann, A. (2022, Juli).Licht am Ende des Tunnels? Mit Transparenzzstandards in Richtung Open Science. In U. Dirnagl & A. Scheel (Vorsitz), Meta-Research. auf dem Symposium Wissenschaftsforschung im Fokus - Potentiale und neue Perspektiven, VolkswagenStiftung, Hannover. |
Preprints in der deutschen Presse als Ausdruck einer neuen Verwissenschaftlichung der Medien? Eine Mixed-Method Analyse von 400.000 Zeitungsartikeln vor und während der Pandemie.Schniedermann, A., & Simons, A. (2022, Juni).Preprints in der deutschen Presse als Ausdruck einer neuen Verwissenschaftlichung der Medien? Eine Mixed-Method Analyse von 400.000 Zeitungsartikeln vor und während der Pandemie. Vortrag auf der Tagung Offene Tagung der Sektion Politische Soziologie, Leopold Ringel, Alejandro Esguerra & Holger Straßheim, Universität Bielefeld. |
Evidenz-basierte Politik als politisches Programm. Eine kritische Netzwerkanalyse.Simons, A., & Schniedermann, A. (2022, Juni).Evidenz-basierte Politik als politisches Programm. Eine kritische Netzwerkanalyse. Vortrag auf der Tagung Offene Tagung der Sektion Politische Soziologie, Alejandro Esguerra, Leopold Ringel & Holger Straßheim, Universität Bielefeld. |
Standardization in Science. Effects and issues of Guidelines for Biomedical Reporting.Schniedermann, A. (2022, März).Standardization in Science. Effects and issues of Guidelines for Biomedical Reporting. Vortrag auf dem Kolloquium der Forschungsgruppe Science and Evaluation Studies (SES), Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS). |
