Publications

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

A CRISP-DM and predictive analytics framework for enhanced decision-making in research information management systems.

Azeroual, O., Nacheva, R., Nikiforova, A., & Störl, U. (2025).
A CRISP-DM and predictive analytics framework for enhanced decision-making in research information management systems. Informatica, 2025(49), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v49i18.5613

Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus.

Culbert, J. H., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., & Mayr, P. (2025).
Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05293-3
Abstract

OpenAlex is a promising open source of scholarly metadata, and competitor to established proprietary sources, such as the Web of Science and Scopus. As OpenAlex provides its data freely and openly, it permits researchers to perform bibliometric studies that can be reproduced in the community without licensing barriers. However, as OpenAlex is a rapidly evolving source and the data contained within is expanding and also quickly changing, the question naturally arises as to the trustworthiness of its data. In this report, we will study the reference coverage and selected metadata within each database and compare them with each other to help address this open question in bibliometrics. [...]

Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024.

Hartstein, J., Blümel, C., & Klein, D. (2025).
Trendumfrage Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen 2024. Daten- und Methodenbericht. Hannover: DZHW.
Abstract

The Trend Survey Research Data Infrastructures 2024 is part of the accompanying research of the Basic Services for the National Research Data Infrastructure (Base4NFDI). The trend survey captures the perception, use and evaluation of established and new data infrastructures and services in the German research landscape. The focus in on the perspective of (potential) users.

Good practice-Beispiel 2: " Datenbasiertes Qualitäts- und Prozessmanagement zur Promotion an der TUM " (Impulsvortrag T. Klinge, Technische Universität München).

Wegner, A., & Thiedig, C. (2025).
Session Good practice-Beispiel 2: "Datenbasiertes Qualitäts- und Prozessmanagement zur Promotion an der TUM" (Impulsvortrag T. Klinge, Technische Universität München) im Rahmen der Veranstaltungsreihe „Good practices der Daten- und Evidenznutzung an Hochschulen“, DZHW, online.

Kompetenzentwicklung im Forschungsinformationsmanagement.

Geschäftsstelle der KFiD, & Berliner Arbeitskreis Information (2025).
Workshop Kompetenzentwicklung im ForschungsinformationsmanagementEine hybride Veranstaltung der Geschäftsstelle der KFiD in Kooperation mit dem Berliner Arbeitskreis Information (BAK), Berlin, Deutschland.

Good practice-Beispiel 1 " Strategische Datennutzung in der Nachwuchsförderung an der TU Darmstadt " (Impulsvortrag Dr. B. Wagner, Technische Universität Darmstadt).

Thiedig, C., & Wegner, A. (2025).
Session Good practice-Beispiel 1 "Strategische Datennutzung in der Nachwuchsförderung an der TU Darmstadt" (Impulsvortrag Dr. B. Wagner, Technische Universität Darmstadt) im Rahmen der Veranstaltungsreihe „Good practices der Daten- und Evidenznutzung an Hochschulen“, DZHW, online.

Bausteine für das Forschungsinformationsmanagement der Zukunft: Vorstellung des neuen KDSF 2.0.

Geschäftsstelle der KFiD (2025).
Workshop Bausteine für das Forschungsinformationsmanagement der Zukunft: Vorstellung des neuen KDSF 2.0, Berlin.

Empowering IT-Supported Research Management: Leveraging Data Science Methods for Informed Decisions.

Azeroual, O. (2025).
Empowering IT-Supported Research Management: Leveraging Data Science Methods for Informed Decisions. In Tallón-Ballesteros, A.J. (Hrsg.), Digitalization and Management Innovation III (S. 39-51). Amsterdam: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA250006

Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative.

Lovakov, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2025).
Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative. Scientometrics, 2025(130), 1813-1829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05269-3

Publikationen als Outputdimension der Forschungsförderung.

Möller, T., & Dittmann, P. (2025).
Publikationen als Outputdimension der Forschungsförderung. Internationalität und Exzellenz in bibliometrischer Perspektive. DAAD Forschung Kompakt. Bonn: DAAD. https://doi.org/10.46685/DAADStudien.2025.02

On author self-citations as carriers of scientific topic structure information.

Donner, P., & Henneken, E. (2025).
On author self-citations as carriers of scientific topic structure information. Quantitative Science Studies (online first). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00357
Abstract

Author self-citations are a somewhat controversial phenomenon. Some scholars maintain they are a normal, even indispensable, part of scientific referencing practice, while others claim they are frequently an expression of vanity and self-promotion. Citations are the basic data for citation network clustering, an important approach to creating bottom-up, data-driven, global taxonomic systems of research publications. Thus the topical information content of self-citations is of particular interest in this context. [...]

Spieglein, Spieglein an der Wand: Wer hat ein Forschungsinformationssystem im Land? – Die FIS-Landkarte geht online.

Petersohn, S., & Nagel, S. (27. Januar 2025).
Spieglein, Spieglein an der Wand: Wer hat ein Forschungsinformationssystem im Land? – Die FIS-Landkarte geht online [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://blog.dini.de/EPub_FIS/2025/01/27/fis-landkarte-geht-online/

Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable psychology journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality.

Stephen, D. (2025).
Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable psychology journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality. Journal of Informetrics (online first). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101640

Open Research Tools. Status-Quo, Herausforderungen und Perspektiven für Deutschland.

Streicher, J., Blümel, C., Schniedermann, A., Hartstein, J., & Schütz, M. (2025).
Workshop Open Research Tools. Status-Quo, Herausforderungen und Perspektiven für Deutschland., Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Berlin, Deutschland.

Bibliometric approaches for tracing knowledge flows.

Aman, V. (2025).
Bibliometric approaches for tracing knowledge flows. Dissertation an der Technischen Universität Berlin. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-22420

Contact

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Acting Head +49 30 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Acting Head +49 30 2064177-18
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Deputy Head +49 30 2064177-24

Projects

All research department projects

Staff

All research department staff

Publications

All research department publications

Presentations and conferences

All research department presentations and conferences